Experiment 06 · Restricted instructor material
Instructor answer key
Reasoned answers and misconception checks for the saturation teaching kit.
Answer key and reasoning
- Yes. An aggregate can hide a hot core, lock, queue, quota or dependency. Saturation is queued or refused work at a limiting resource, not a universal utilization threshold.
- It chooses an earlier, legible failure. A bound can reject or expire work before physical memory, connections or latency collapse unpredictably.
- Scaling created new provisioning and connection demand. The response was locally rational yet coupled to other finite services.
- Log amplification. Error volume may consume CPU, allocations, threads, I/O, bytes or inodes and deepen the incident.
- Restart resets the evidence. If each deploy clears retained resources, the leak appears as a long-horizon trend or only during an unusually long interval.
- Recognition, authority, expertise and feedback. Someone must know when and how to use the flag, have access, and observe whether it helped.
- Unknown boundaries require evidence. The point is not to welcome harm; it is that small contained surprises and vicarious learning reveal brittleness that design alone misses.
- Sensemaking. Preserve signals, hypotheses, discarded explanations, coordination constraints, improvisations and what responders needed but lacked.
Exercise B guidance
- Pool headroom primarily expands the base envelope.
- An expiring traffic block creates optionality; using it well activates adaptive capacity.
- Isolation expertise turns a control into adaptive capacity.
- A reasoning-rich postmortem develops future expertise and therefore potential adaptive capacity.
Return to lesson